Public Theology About   Organize   Theology   Church   Philosophy   Ethics   Politics   Planning   Society   Economy   Creation   Peace   Preach   Media   TheoEd   Contact  Home  Subscribe   Get Our Newsletter
Contact Us

NBForrest.jpg
The South has Never Confessed Its Sins
Virginia Governor McDonnell's failure to include slavery in his Confederate History Month declaration exposes a bigger problem for the South and for the country, continuing race-based politics.

By Ed Knudson

When I read the article below by Chris Kromm on cultural symbols of the Confederacy in the Southern United States I asked myself whether the South as a region of the country has ever substantially and clearly confessed its sin of slavery. After the Civil War the South was able to in many ways reinstitute dominance of white people over blacks. It was not for another hundred years until black people themselves in the 1960s were able through the civil rights movement to gain legal rights to participate in the life of the community and to vote. And since then there has been a powerful political backlash as the South turned to the Republican Party to oppose the gains of blacks and to oppose the "big federal government" which forced the South to change its ways of segregation. Through right wing religion, the Southern Baptists and Pentecostal television preachers who come out of the South, anti-government and anti-abortion political and cultural movements have been able to significantly dominate public consciousness these last decades. This means that rather than confess the sin of slavery these religious and political movements have been efforts to repress the sin and claim moral superiority of the South over those Northern elite liberals who hate the country.

Virginia Republican Governaor Bob McDonnell has now been forced to include a statement about slavery in his recent declaration of a "Confederate History" month. So he says the words of confession in a sense, but does he really mean them? The coded language of all the right wing radio and television talks shows demonstrates the strong but subtle continuing racism in this country, a refusal to face the facts of the original sin of slavery.

I think of Germany and the great difficulty it has had to face the facts of the Nazi extermination camps, to reckon with its history, to confess its sin. But there have been efforts in that country to remember its past so that nothing like that would happen again. But the South in this country does not want to remember the facts of its history and clearly confess its sin and this is reflected in its political attitudes.

The group which published the below article, however, is interested in a "changing South" and I highly recommend its website, The Institute for Southern Studies. One can hope that groups such as this and more people in the South will be able to help change the cultural habits that are so damaging not only to the South but to the rest of the country. We need to get past racial politics to be able to adequately and rationally address the other pressing problems we face.

-----------------------

Here is the Chris Kromm article:

When Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell declared April as the state's Confederate History Month, Republican operatives likely thought it was a safe and symbolic gesture that would please the state's older conservatives. Instead, it's exploded into a national news story, raising sharp questions about how race is used in politics -- and how the South's Confederate past still haunts its political present. The biggest scandal is what McDonnell's proclamation left out: Not once, in five "whereas" clauses, did it mention slavery. McDonnell batted away criticism about the oversight, saying:
"There were any number of aspects to that conflict between the states. Obviously, it involved slavery. It involved other issues. But I focused on the ones I thought were most significant for Virginia."
Which apparently didn't include 4 million African-Americans held in slavery. By the end of the day, after critics including the GOP-inclined Richmond Times-Dispatch denounced him, McDonnell shifted gears and added another clause stating "the institution of slavery led to this war and was an evil and inhumane practice."

But it was too little, too late -- and didn't hide the fact that McDonnell's "omission" wasn't an accident: As Adam Sorensen at Time points out, earlier Republican proclamations for Confederate History Month did include references to slavery; McDonnell just cut them out of his version.

NEO-CONFEDERATES AMONG US

For Southerners, the McDonnell affair is hardly Big News. As historian James Loewen documented in his excellent book Lies Across America, Southern states are filled with thousands of historical markers, tourist sites and other remembrances of the Confederacy that downplay, or entirely omit, the essential racism behind the Confederate project. The end result is that Southerners grow up surrounded by one-sided history, etched into the very landscape. Attempts to romanticize and rehabilitate the Confederate past can take on near-comical proportions. As Loewen wrote for Southern Exposure magazine in 2000:
Although many Confederates were conquered in spirit in 1865, between about 1890 and 1930, neo-Confederates declared victory on the landscape all across the United States, including places that never existed or never were Confederate during the war. A Confederate monument dominates the lawn of the east Bolivar County courthouse in Cleveland, Mississippi, for example, "To the memory of our Confederate dead, 1861-65." The only problem is, Cleveland, Mississippi, had no Confederate dead. Cleveland did not exist during the Civil War or for some decades afterwards.
Even when historically accurate, these ever-present memorials usually go beyond remembering Confederate "heritage" and end up glorifying the Confederacy.

Consider the Arlington Confederate Monument, where even President Obama felt obliged to lay a wreath in 2009, like presidents before him. As leading neo-Confederate scholar Ed Sebesta pointed out in a letter to Obama at the time, the goal of the monument was not just to remember the Confederate dead, but to champion the Confederate cause. Indeed, the Arlington monument's Latin motto is "Victrix causea Diis placuit, sed victa Catoni." That translates into, "The winning cause pleased the Gods, but the losing cause pleased Cato" -- the implication being that Cato, the stoic advocate of "freedom," would have sided with the Confederacy, a sentiment that descendants of slaves would find deeply ironic.

The same is true with the Museum of the Confederacy, also in Virginia. As Southern Exposure reported in 2000, future President George W. Bush was a donor to the museum's annual Confederate ball, which each year draws hundreds of all-white guests in period costumes. But the Museum of the Confederacy is hardly an innocent history operation: Its store is stocked with far-right literature on race and politics, including books by neo-Confederate ideologue Ludwell Johnson, who in 1993 was appointed as a "museum fellow" -- author of "Is the Confederacy Obsolete?" and other calls for revival of the old Southern system.

Sometimes, the racial motives of neo-Confederate remembrances are subtle. Other times, they are crystal clear, as with the the decision by white leaders to adopt Confederate flags in Georgia (1956) and South Carolina (1962). Today, historians agree these were moves were timed to protest the growing civil rights movement and its challenge to Jim Crow.

So McDonnell's antics and appeals to Southern white racial resentment are hardly new, or news, in the South. But the scandal does pose hard questions for conservatives: How will such thinly-veiled racial codes by Southern politicians play out nationally? What does this mean for their efforts to reach moderates and independents?

And as the South and country grow more racially and ethnically diverse, how do appeals to Old South racial politics help conservatives' long-term political prospects?

Note on image at top: Painting of Nathan Bedford Forrest, leader of the Ku Klux Klan in Tennessee and Confederate cavalry leader. Forrest has more historical markers in the country than any other figure, according to historian James Loewen.




Please Comment - See More Articles in this Section - Submitted By: 5520

Date Added: 4/10/2010 Date Revised: 4/11/2010

  Sponsored by the
Center for
Public Theology
.
About   Organize   Theology   Church   Philosophy   Ethics   Politics   Planning   Society   Economy   Creation   Peace   Preach   Media   TheoEd   Contact  Home  Subscribe