Public Theology About   Organize   Theology   Church   Philosophy   Ethics   Politics   Planning   Society   Economy   Creation   Peace   Preach   Media   TheoEd   Contact  Home  Subscribe   Get Our Newsletter
Contact Us

Republicans, Democrats and Public Theology
Godís justice is that God loves Bill Clinton, Ken Starróall those desperate Democrats and those mean Republicans alike.

By Diana Butler Bass

December, 1998

After a couple of hours of watching the recent impeachment debate in Congress, I wondered if I was watching Christian television instead of C-SPAN.

In a day of speeches, House members pontificated on the Bible nearly as much as they addressed the Constitution.

Not surprisingly, congressional Bible-quoting fell along strictly partisan lines. Republicans most often cited Old Testament moral prohibitionsóespecially the 10 Commandments. Democrats favored the New Testament. They frequently quoted Jesus: "Judge not, lest you be judged" and "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."

This biblical partisanship reflects deep divisions in our nationís theological consciousness. Republicans, whose public theology is largely shaped by conservative Christianity, tend to depict God as a wrathful deity. Democrats, whose civic piety is determined by religious liberalism, preach a God of love.

When looking to scripture to support public religious pronouncements, Republicans turn toward the stern God of the Old Testament. Democrats find the forgiving Jesus of the New Testament more appealing. One side warns of judgment, the other proclaims mercy.

Accordingly, God either wants Bill Clinton condemned or welcomed home like the Prodigal Son. Since the Republicans hold the majority, God-as-Judge won in the House of Representatives.

This is, however, problematic. Public theology is about as textured as a piece of typing paper. Bible-spouting aside, most congressional representatives proved themselves lousy theologians in this argument.

During the debate, Congress fell for the oldest trick in the book: dividing God into neat categories of justice and mercy. In the second century, a church leader named Marcion argued much the same thingóthat the New Testament taught a Gospel of Love over and against the Old Testamentís wrathful God.

Other Christians rejected this view, insisting instead on a fundamental unity between the two testaments. The God of the Old Testament and the God of the New are, in spite of the theological disagreements between Jews and Christians, the same God.

Although this position became orthodoxy, Christian tradition continued to struggle with the tension between Godís justice and love. For most of its history, the church has tended to emphasize Godís justice over Godís mercy. Very few Christians understand the orthodox position: God is both just and merciful at the same time.

In the 16th Century, the problem of justice and mercy tormented the Protestant reformer Martin Luther. Convinced he would be rightly damned for his sins, Luther could not conceive of a loving God. Indeed, Luther said he hated God because of God's unrelenting justice.

After years of prayer and study Luther realized that God is, indeed, just. But Godís justice is not distant and condemning judgementalism that sends sinners to hell. Rather, God justifies humankind through grace. Luther became convinced that Godís justice is Godís grace that justifiesó"makes right"óhumanity. God does not condemn. God makes us holyóno matter how bad or sinful we have been.

Lutherís theological realization, referred to as the Lutheran paradox, is the heartbeat of biblical faith. The Old Testament God is not a wrathful judge. Rather, throughout scripture God is a wooing lover calling creation into union with the divine presence Justice melts into mercy; and vengeance belongs only to Godís mysterious providence. Godís justice is Godís love; Godís love is Godís justice.

What has all this to do with Bill Clinton and Congress? Plenty. Godís justice is that God loves Bill Clinton, Ken Starróall those desperate Democrats and those mean Republicans alike. And Godís love is that none of them knowóor begin to understandóthe counsels of God. Whatever they do is ultimately nothing. It is, as the Old Testament teaches, "The flower that fades, the grass that withers." Vanity, vanity, all is vanity.

However relevant this paradox may be, public theology can never embrace it. By its nature, civic piety demands clarity. So Bible-quoting politicians proclaim they know the mind of God. Condemn with glee. Forgive and forget. Paradox cannot exist in this clear-cut, vote-counting world.

Diana Butler Bass (dibutler@aol.com) is associate professor of religious studies at Rhodes College in Memphis. Her latest book is "Standing Against the Whirlwind: Evangelical Episcopalians in 19th Century America."

Please Comment - See More Articles in this Section - Submitted By: 5520

Date Added: 9/10/2001 Date Revised: 10/12/2001

  Sponsored by the
Center for
Public Theology
.
About   Organize   Theology   Church   Philosophy   Ethics   Politics   Planning   Society   Economy   Creation   Peace   Preach   Media   TheoEd   Contact  Home  Subscribe