Paul Newman's own Paul Newman is uk omega replica actually, 3 color, unlocked version of 6239. The watch was given to replica watches uk his daughter's boyfriend by Paul Newman himself in that year. Now, the owner of rolex uk the watch, the boyfriend of the daughter, took out the rolex replica watch and auctioned it at the auction house of rich artists.
Public Theology Blogs
  Public Theology About   Organize   Theology   Church   Philosophy   Ethics   Politics   Planning   Society   Economy   Creation   Peace   Preach   Media   TheoEd   Contact  Home  Subscribe   Get Our Newsletter
Contact Us

After research, the 3 color lock Paul Newman is rolex replica watch very rare, because it is scarce, so the beautiful watch value is high. Allegedly, this special 3 color lock Paul Newman also because, never to swiss replica watches lock the evolution process of lock, Rolex in the early 3 color dial, re printed on the replica rolex uk new words, to use a lock on the Paul Newman oyster. So there's this mix and play.
 
Blogs

Click on topic below to see all blogs for that topic:
Church and State
Critical Social Theory
Cultural Redemption
Death Camp Thinking
Domestic Terrorism
Economic Justice
Environmental Justice
Faith Matters
Fascism
Final Post
Foreign Policy
Future Church
Global Peace
Justice Ministry
Liberation Theology
Media Stupidity
New Theology
Online Community
Pastoral Consciousness
Political Philosophy
Political Power
Preaching Today
Professional Ethics
Race Matters
Religious Right
Responsible Development
Secularism
Sexuality
Terrorism
Urban Development

See Writers

Contact Us
Subscribe
Home


Please let us know what you think of these blogs.
Topic: Race Matters

Members of Trump's Religious Advisory Council Have Not Resigned
8/25/2017 6:04:58 PM

Update 8/25/17: Jim Winkler, General Secretary and President of the National Council of Churches, has a column in the New York Times on the advisory council. This is unusual. The mainline media rarely give voice to the mainline churches in their own voice.

Update: "The lead pastor at the Christian Cultural Center, the largest evangelical church in New York City, [A.R.] Bernard tweeted out his letter of resignation from the high-profile board on Friday (Aug. 18)". He says he quietly had stepped away from the board earlier.


Here is a list of Donald Trump's Religious Advisory Council. Despite the fact that Trump has now made himself explicitly known as not only a serial sexual predator but also a white racist intent to use the full power of the federal government against people of color, the people below have not resigned from his council.

So many business leaders have resigned over Trump's racial comments that three different business advisory councils have disbanded.

Every person on this list must be considered a total moral failure, a person who should not be considered worthy of any following whatsoever, least of all anyone who considers themselves a follower of Jesus Christ. Please stay away from any of the groups or associations related in any way to the people listed here.

· Michele Bachmann – Former Congresswoman

· A.R. Bernard – Senior Pastor and CEO, Christian Cultural Center

· Mark Burns – Pastor, Harvest Praise and Worship Center

· Tim Clinton – President, American Association of Christian Counselors

· Kenneth and Gloria Copeland – Founders, Kenneth Copeland Ministries

· James Dobson – Author, Psychologist, and Host, My Family Talk

· Jerry Falwell, Jr. – President, Liberty University

· Ronnie Floyd – Senior Pastor, Cross Church

· Jentezen Franklin – Senior Pastor, Free Chapel

· Jack Graham – Senior Pastor, Prestonwood Baptist Church

· Harry Jackson – Senior Pastor, Hope Christian Church

· Robert Jeffress – Senior Pastor, First Baptist Church of Dallas

· David Jeremiah – Senior Pastor, Shadow Mountain Community Church

· Richard Land – President, Southern Evangelical Seminary

· Johnnie Moore – Author, President of The KAIROS Company

· Robert Morris – Senior Pastor, Gateway Church

· Tom Mullins – Senior Pastor, Christ Fellowship­

· Ralph Reed – Founder, Faith and Freedom Coalition

· James Robison – Founder, Life OUTREACH International

· Tony Suarez – Executive Vice President, National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference

· Jay Strack – President, Student Leadership University

· Paula White – Senior Pastor, New Destiny Christian Center

· Tom Winters – Attorney, Winters and King, Inc.

· Sealy Yates – Attorney, Yates, and Yates



Source


See This Blog

Church Leaders in Charlottesville Prepared for White Supremacists
8/16/2017 2:23:21 PM

When Donald Trump in his news conference in Trump Tower yesterday said that "both sides" were to blame for the violence in Charlottesville he probably didn't know that one side, the counter-protester side, was largely organized by the churches of the city. Jonathan Blitzer talks about it at the New Yorker. The president referred to the "alt-left" as if it is as violent as the "alt-right", a false moral equivalence even as it is an invention of a group that doesn't exist (who calls themselves the alt-left?).

I think that the president's new response to what happened in Charlottesville is creating the conditions for the end of his presidency. It was painful for him earlier to explicitly criticize the neo-Nazis and white supremacists. If anyone could question whether this president was an explicit racist, now it is so clear that no one can deny it.

Birthism was the issue he used to gain broad public attention. Now he has stated that the counter demonstrators were more violent than the white nationalists and neo-Nazis who came to Charlottesville for the primary reason to generate a violent confrontation with people in a liberal college town. Think about that. This president in an unprecedented move has placed himself symbolically with white nationalists who identify with the Nazi tradition against which this country fought a major war. Chants in their demonstration explicitly referenced their hatred for Jews.

So many corporate leaders have been pulling out of his advisory councils that Trump has disbanded them. Think about that too. Trump, the businessman, cannot keep business on his side.

The Trump comments have been so bad that there are now calls for those working in this administration to resign. A Washington Post headline reads "Everyone working for Trump knows his Charlottesville response is an abomination".

The Post also published a story about the late night comics.
ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel also didn’t hold back. “It was supposed to be a press conference about infrastructure, and it ended with our president making an angry and passionate defense of white supremacists,” he told his audience, urging them to watch the “astonishing” conference in its entirety online. “I feel like I can say this with reasonable certainty: The president is completely unhinged.”



See This Blog

Old Republican Tactic: Stoke Fear of Crime
3/13/2017 4:08:40 PM

Donald Trump in his campaign, in his inaugural address, and in his actions such as his Muslim ban, is using a tactic which Republicans have been using for decades: stoking fear of crime and of others who are different and not white. The New York Times has an excellent article on this.

The new focus is on "nationalism" over against "globalism" as if this country ought to close itself off from the rest of the planet. Over at First Things magazine they are talking a lot about this right now, the "new" nationalism of Russia and the United States.

But this ground is not so new. It's a theme Republicans have been hammering for a long time. Here is a quote:
Crime — especially urban crime — lies at the heart of the new nationalist message, in part as an argument for why liberal-run cities, with their dense, diverse, polyglot communities, shouldn’t serve as a model for the nation as a whole.

Since the outset of his campaign, Trump has exaggerated the violence and poverty of “inner cities,” painting them as war zones and blaming Democrats for the destruction. The politics behind this sort of language are not new: For 50 years, Republican candidates for president have won by stoking fear of crime, promising to “restore order and respect for law in this country,” as Richard Nixon put it in 1968. But Trump has been fixated on the issue, ignoring actual crime statistics to inaccurately blame African-Americans for most white homicides and falsely claim that the murder rate is at its highest point in 47 years.

See This Blog

White People are Hurting Themselves
3/11/2017 4:37:57 PM

On the night that Barack Obama was elected in 2008 I was with a group of pastors and their spouses at the home of a friend near Gig Harbor, Washington. I was sitting in a chair somewhat closer to the television than the others, for which I was thankful, because as the night went on and it looked like Obama was going to beat Mitt Romney I found tears coming down my face so much so that I would be embarrassed should everyone be able to see it. It was hard to believe that a black man could be elected president in this country.

I had spent many years working and living in black communities in Washington D.C., Chicago, Illinois, st. Paul, Minnesota, and Portland, Oregon. I had served as pastor of a large black middle class congregation in Chicago. I had spent long hours of conversation and counseling with black people and came to identify with them and viewed the world and history from their perspective. So when a black man was being elected president it brought tears to my eyes.

But for many white people the opposite was true. I remember that week of the election going to a theological discussion group of a congregation in Tacoma. So excited by Obama's victory I announced to the group, "The civil war is finally over." But a fellow named Joe toward the back of the room just slowly shook his head side to side clearly disagreeing with my announcement. Joe worked at a factory and knew that his white fellow workers were not so happy with the election.

Joe's reaction has stayed with me over these past years. It was extremely disheartening to see that the Republican Party decided to oppose everything Obama did. The Republican Party, with its base in the racism of Southern states, oriented to right wing radio which spews self-righteous, racist anger 24 hours a day, and influenced greatly by Southern right wing religion which uses abortion to claim the moral high ground against secular liberals in the North whom Southerners hate with a vengeance for forcing them to change their ways of segregation. The radio and religion have been used to build up extremist anger at Obama which has created the conditions to elect a delusional sexual predator as president, Donald Trump.

Just imagine that. So-called "conservatives", those concerned with sexual righteousness, both conservative Catholics and religious right revivalists, have allowed their anger at a black president to result in the election of an actual acknowledged sexual predator as president who has been acting in his first weeks to literally destroy the structures of society that provide for the order and stability that have been enjoyed over the past seventy years. It is white people hurting themselves. If the Republicans are able to destroy Obamacare it will mean that in very clear and definite ways very large numbers of white people, along with black and brown people, will increasingly suffer and die due to lack of health insurance. It really is true. Political anger can kill you.

If you act on the basis of anger, hatred, hostility, it will not go well with you. White people are violating this very basic rule of social life. The evidence for the fact that white anger was a factor in the election of Trump is discussed in this article about Cornell Belcher, a Democratic pollster.

If you are a Republican white person, it would be good if you would think about this. Your party is really going down the wrong road with this president.


See This Blog

Martin Marty Center Publishes Column in Support of Disgraced White Nationalist, Milo Yiannopoulos
2/28/2017 7:01:32 PM

Update on 3/2/17: The editor of the Sightings column, Brett Colasacco, put together a Packet on Rachel Fulton Brown which contains several significant reactions to her writing, including a very strong repudiation from a former student (Miles S. Hopgood, Princeton Theological Seminary). What is interesting to me in an unfortunate way is that we here have a very conservative professor writing standard, hateful anti-university platitudes who then thinks that she can gain attention by supporting an otherwise sad figure like Milo Yiannopoulos who makes political outrage, not research and reflection, into an industry for profit, and then thinks what is really hate speech should be freely presented on college campuses in the name of free speech. Milo should go to Liberty University to give his remarks. "Conservatism" is anything but really conservative today. It's the way of the media, only conflict gets attention for profit, even in academic venues.

I was surprised to see an article by Rachel Fulton Brown at the Sightings column on February 16, 2017, at the Martin Marty Center for the Advanced Study of Religion, one of the more important places for doing public theology in the country. Usually Marty himself has written the column and I haven't kept up with changes that have been made. Others are now writing for it I guess. And the Brown piece was really something else.

It came to the aid of Milo Yiannopoulos. Just to remind people here is how the column begins:
On Wednesday, February 1st, there was a riot at the University of California, Berkeley. The College Republicans had invited Breitbart Senior Editor Milo Yiannopoulos to campus for what was supposed to be the concluding event of his year-long “Dangerous Faggot Tour.” Over 100 UC Berkeley professors signed a letter saying that Milo shouldn't be allowed to speak, but the administration let the talk go ahead, acknowledging that the First Amendment prohibits public universities from censoring speakers on the basis of their views.
Breitbart is the media agency which was run by Steve Bannon, now chief strategist for Donald Trump, which is why this is no small matter. The agency just a few days ago fired Yiannopoulos, due to a rebellion against him by other staff. Yiannopoulos had also been disinvited to a recent conservative convention because he had made online comments about the appropriateness of homosexual relations between older men and boys. Bannon has said that he wanted Breitbart to be a platform for the "alt-right" which is a term for a political orientation associated with white nationalism.

I watched many campaign appearances of Donald Trump. He regularly and explicitly used racist rhetoric. In fact, of course, he was widely reported in the press for his comments about the Obama birth certificate, an issue which appealed to white racists whether consciously or subconsciously. Trump in many ways indicated he was not going to reject the support of racists. Yiannopoulos calls Trump "daddy" indicating strong affection for the man, apparently, though with Yiannopoulos it is difficult sometimes to know when he is being sarcastic or serious. In fact, that aspect of the Bannon/Trump phenomenon, whether there is any "truth" in their statements, has became a very major issue in public life today.

So I was surprised to see a column in "Sightings" which gave substantive support to Yiannopoulos and what he was trying to do with his “Dangerous Faggot Tour.”
Milo himself has characterized the violence at Berkeley as fundamentally political, but the fervor with which students supported the rioters suggests that it has deeper roots. “Politics,” as Andrew Breitbart liked to say, “is downstream from culture.” But culture's wellspring is religion, the one thing that most colleges and universities, their students, and faculty claim—as a result of their commitment to academic freedom—not to have. More even than the current tensions in the political sphere, this denial of religion as the basis of culture is the source of the violence we are now witnessing, both on campuses and across America at large.
Now, I had to read this paragraph several times. Rachel Fulton Brown is repeating the common modern notion that religion is not the center of thought in higher education institutions today, as it was in the medieval period. But then she says that religion comes before culture and somehow that is crucial to know, yet she has not demonstrated why or how the two are so different. And then she says that the "denial of religion as the basis of culture is the source of the violence" on and off campuses, so this is a really, really big deal, it would seem. She is talking about "the source of violence" itself in our society. And she blames the university.

"Not to address these issues openly does not allow students to keep an open mind. Their minds are already open—and being filled with what they are given in place of religion: multiculturalism; race, class, gender; the purportedly secular ideals of socialism and Marxism." Yes, there it is, the problem is that the professors are teaching socialism and Marxism. Wow. She says that is her experience as a professor for over 30 years. And this is what is causing violence in our society. Now, I would like to say that I worked at a public university for four years (Bemidji State University) and never once heard any professor promoting socialism and Marxism. The one strange fellow I heard about at the University of Minnesota who called himself a socialist had become a popular speaker at church youth meetings.

What Brown claims is that Yiannopoulos is trying to make Christians of the students who come to listen to him, he is trying to convert them. And the students and faculty of secular institutions are so afraid of religion that they violently refuse to listen to someone like this. This is an especially weird way to think about religion. In fact, it gives religion much more power than I think it has on campus or in public life. What Brown is not seeing straight is that religion is being used by the political right to gain political power over others of a different religious point of view.

To show this just take a look at the speech at Mankato State University (also in Minnesota) referenced by Brown, available at Breitbart. The speech, believe it or not, is all about the "fact" that "liberals" and "the left" hate Christmas. Yes, I know, it is hard to believe this. This has become the big conservative talking point, especially around Christmas time. The left hates Christmas and you need to vote for Republicans because they will bring Christmas back again. I believe this is a huge abuse of religious faith, it is ridiculous. But for Brown, this is central, apparently, proof that the university has gone totally pagan.

Yiannopoulos says: "Leftists wage the war on Christmas using their traditional methods- government fiat and the court system. They never win voting, and they certainly don’t win in the free market, so they bravely fight their battles through big government."

Yes again, it is "big government" that "leftists" use to try to deny the celebration of Christmas. The fact is that the talk of "happy holidays" is heard primarily in the big shopping centers and chain stores, or, otherwise, the "market" and not big government. I myself have assisted the ACLU in banning Christian symbolism from government property because I don't believe government should be in any way a custodian of the symbols of Christian faith. That is the church's work.

And, of course, as Yiannopoulos says clearly, Christianity is the religion of white people. And leftists hate white people and love Muslims. Yes, he says all that sort of stuff and apparently for Rachel Fulton Brown this is at the basis of violence in our society.

Well, maybe she has something there. The violence done to others in name of white Christianity over the centuries is actually something that should receive serious reflection. Yiannopoulos wants Christianity to help Republicans dominate governmental power. He says he is himself a Catholic, but he is actually talking like a representative of the religious right, those who take pride in the fact that they have elected Donald Trump. And that is the true source of a terrible violence that continues in this culture. Trump just the other day said he will propose building more nuclear weapons so the United States is at the top of the pack. Some Christian orientation.

It is that kind of talk that can, indeed, destroy the world God has made. Milo Yiannopoulos is using religion to make himself into a public figure by which to enrich himself. That is his true god, the so-called "market". He markets himself by saying outrageous things, just like so many on right wing radio and television such as Ann Coulter. This is not responsible politics and there is every good reason for university officials to question the misuse of outrageous behavior. And the Republican Party should ask itself whether it really wants to be associated with such a person as a kind of spokesperson for their cause. Furthermore, there is a certain point at which sheer stupidity should no longer be deemed to qualify as free speech in public discourse. The way Yiannopoulos refers to "the left" and "liberals" is just stupid and false but this is the way right wing media talk all the time. There is a certain point at which telling gross lies again and again should not allowed if it requires public resources like the air waves. Professor Brown repeats the worst sort of right wing propaganda as if it is scholarly truth. If there is an issue of how the university treats religion it is certainly not true that Yiannopoulos represents any kind of solution.

But why would the Martin Marty Center put up something this bad by Rachel Fulton Brown? I went to the center's Facebook page and there is nothing about it there. Maybe they should take it off the site. It really is not worthy to be considered in the world of public theology today. The way to deal with troubled children like Milo Yiannopoulos is to ignore their antics.










See This Blog

Listen to a Black Man Standing Silently at a Trump Rally
3/15/2016 7:22:43 PM

James E. Troup is a black man who boldly went to Donald Trump’s Dayton, Ohio, rally last weekend to silently observe the crowd’s response to Trump’s rhetoric and people of color within the audience. Here is what he says:
This is what I will say about the Trump rally I attended Saturday…alone.

It was scary. This man knows just what to say to fire up his crowd, no matter how factually inaccurate it may be.

Wall! ISIS! Kill Them! Mexico!

Then there was the blatant fear mongering. He told Ohioans that only oil was propping up their state, and that their economy was in serious trouble. He said this over and over again.

He also told the crowd that ISIS was out to kill them. That ISIS was putting 50 people at a time in cages and drowning them in the ocean. And that we had to kill them first.

Cheers for water boarding. Cheers for torture. Calls to cut off their heads.

If this was a brown person saying the exact same things in the Middle East, we’d call them a dangerous terrorist. But since it’s a white man in America, we call him a Presidential Candidate.

The scariest part was the crowd. They loved everything that was being said. The calls for the wall. The calls to blow up oil fields. The calls to torture and kill people.

And the protestors. Every time a protestor was kicked out, they were yells to get them out of here, even to KILL THEM!!!

Really? Kill them? For protesting?

I felt like at any point, the crowd was going to light torches and grab their pitchforks, and spill out into the streets.

The worst part was when their venom turned toward me. There were protestors around me who got ushered out, and then people started pointing at me, motioning for the Secret Service to “get him out of there”.

Now mind you, I hadn’t uttered a single word the entire rally, but people still said things like “Well what about this one? He needs to go too!”

At this point, the black kid that grew up in the projects, surrounded by drugs and gunfire, felt CONCERNED for his safety…at a Donald Trump rally.

At that rally, I saw the scary underbelly of America. I saw unadulterated hate, fueled by intentional misinformation.

These people who, just 2 hours ago, seemed like good and kind people, were now cheering for blood.

The worst part is Donald Trump knows EXACTLY what he’s doing. He’s patterned his campaign after a WWE match…

And it’s working.

‪#‎Trump‬ ‪#‎TrumpRally‬


Source




See This Blog

Cornel West Wows a Conservative University Audience
5/4/2015 4:44:17 PM

A conversation between Cornel West and Robert George at Biola University on the topic "Free to Disagree". Notice how the audience at this very conservative university was enjoying the wisdom of Cornel West.



What also struck me about this conversation is the degree to which both Robert George and Rick Warren claimed to support the "bond of truth seeking" and "freedom to disagree" when in fact they both are radical activists in Republican politics trying to take away reproductive choices for women and to deny that gay and lesbian men and women should enjoy full participation in the life of this society. That is, they are actively trying to legally restrict the freedom of both women and gay folks in practical terms. They want to use the power of the government to severely restrict the lives women and gays. I consider what they are doing a kind of stealth political strategy. They want to appear as philosophically and politically "liberal" in order to draw approval for their extremely conservative views.

Here is a critique of this event by Cole Parke at Political Research Associates.

Source at You Tube


See This Blog

The Debate Over Cornel West
4/21/2015 7:21:51 PM

Yesterday I read a long article in The New Republic by Dr. Michael Eric Dyson which has been called "a panoramic, painfully personal, deeply researched 10,000-word excoriation of Dr. Cornel West." That characterization was in a piece in The Nation by Dave Zirin. Cornell West has been the strongest and sharpest critic of Barack Obama and has also criticized black celebrities on MSNBC including Dyson himself, Melissa Harris-Perry, and Al Sharpton.

As I read the Dyson article I kept expecting him to get into the meat of policy disagreements between West and Obama. But they never came. He just focused on less significant interpersonal matters. So I agreed with Zirin when he writes:
But there are several holes in Dyson’s piece that are glaring. To read the article, one would think that West’s anger toward Obama is solely rooted in snubbed invitations and unanswered phone calls. This ignores a series of key political criticisms that West has been raising for years.

Cornel West believes in Palestinian liberation. He believes in amnesty for undocumented immigrants. He believes that the bankers responsible for the 2008 crisis should be brought to justice. He believes that capitalism is a driving engine of much of the injustice in our world. He believes that Obama’s drone program is an act of state-sanctioned murder. One can choose to agree or disagree with these points, but one cannot ignore that West has been relentless in his efforts to place them in the political discourse. The word “Palestine” or “Palestinian” does not once make its way into Dyson’s piece. Neither does “Wall Street” or “immigration.” The word “drones” only comes up in a quote attributed to West. We can debate how sincere West’s commitments are to these issues or whether they are a cover for his hurt feelings and heartbreak that Dyson posits is at the root of all the discord. But they should be reckoned with. Does a “black politics” going forward need to have something to say about corporate power, Israeli occupation, immigration, and drone warfare? That’s the unspoken debate in this article, made all the more glaring because Dyson is sympathetic—and far closer to West than President Obama—on many of these questions.
Zirin is concerned that this debate between current black intellectual leaders is occurring just when there is growing public consciousness over police crimes against black people. There is now a chance for change in how the police treat blacks. I agree with this concern, and wish Dyson had held his fire even though that may be difficult personally.

What we have to face is that the leadership of this country has become nearly entirely corrupt; the institutions of democracy at all levels are failing the American people. The corporate media does not and will not tell the truth. A younger man with whom I had a discussion during the Christmas holiday last year told me he thought that Obama could not do what he knew was right (about the CIA, other spy agencies, and wars in the Middle East) because he would be killed just like John F. Kennedy. Now this was not a person with a strong political consciousness on either the left or right, it was just the assumption of a young person following the news somewhat. I think there are very large numbers of persons with such views; they have lost all faith in the credibility of our political institutions. Cornel West speaks directly into that reality; he articulates how so many feel. Obama was elected to change things, and he tends to do what the people who voted against him want. Now he is even pushing a free trade agreement that gives private corporations more power over political institutions.

So, I hope Dyson can do more of what he accuses West of not doing, putting forward new policy proposals for a just society.

4/24/15 - Glen Ford at Black Agenda Report writes about the Dyson article in a piece titled "Seeking Hillary’s Favor: Dyson Attacks Cornel West".


See This Blog


  Sponsored by the
Center for
Public Theology
.
About   Organize   Theology   Church   Philosophy   Ethics   Politics   Planning   Society   Economy   Creation   Peace   Preach   Media   TheoEd   Contact  Home  Subscribe